On the one hand, you have the January First Presidency letter which has never been rescinded or modified. I think that sexuality is very complex, has a lot of layers, and hopefully continues to evolve over time and age. In it, they emphasized that:. Thanks for reaching out with some questions. Note: After receiving this communication, I sent this therapist links to the documents they referenced and my above analysis but received no reply back. Hence, one way to view the ban and lack of its rescinsion is that it may simply be a chauvinistic policy overt or entirely unintentional. On top of that, I have heard from a well respected professor at BYU that the Church actually wrote a follow up letter rescinding that original letter. On a broad level I would say that is the thinking we operate under safe, sane and consensual. I see this hurt the sexual relationship for a lot of the clients I work with and find that as they step into the discomfort and wrestle with their issues around sex, they are able to own their own sexuality and have more meaningful and satisfying sexual relationships.
© 2020 besttaxiofgwinnett.com - All rights reserved. All Models are over 21 y.o.